|
Arguing Against the Principle of Sufficient Reason in "An Examination of Cosmological Argument" by William Rowe In this paper we can realize how Rowe develops the first premise of explaining God, and why this premise is heavily dependent on interior modes of human thought or perception of the God. For the second premise, Rowe seeks to develop exterior facts about the God, and even through a multiplicity of Gods cannot account for the first basis of reasoning that cannot explain aspects of the God’s actions through ‘others’. These are the problems with PSR, and why insufficient data through the error of human perception cannot sufficiently define God’s existence.
|